It’s a constant struggle.
Teachers say that students need to know certain things in order to be
effective in a given workplace. Take for
example careers in science. It’s one thing
for a teacher to say that you might have to know the names and general
properties of each group of elements in chemistry in order to be a chemical
engineer, but those words might not come with as much credibility, as they
might if they came from the mouth of, let’s say an industrial chemist. So I really think there is a valuable role
for outside professionals to play in the classroom.
After last year’s internship, I grew interested in inviting
professionals and/or academics into my classroom to share their experiences in
the science career field, and answer any questions that students might have
about careers in science. I had a friend
who I went to school with who was working on his Master’s thesis in limnology
at Oklahoma State, and as much as I would have liked to bring him in, the
distances made it impossible. However, I
was able to hook up my iPad to the smartboard and set up a video conference
call of sorts between the class and my out-of-state colleague.
There was a certain novelty to the experience that the
students seemed to appreciate. That was
the first thing that I noticed. Everyone
paid excellent attention to the things my friend, Mr. Nikolai, had to say. He gave a short presentation on the work that
he does in limnology, using both biological and chemical factors to diagnose
the health of reservoirs.
| Mr. Nikolai, on Grand Lake in Oklahoma, collecting sediment cores for analysis. Not exactly stuffy lab work, is it? |
After he had completed this part of his presentation, I
allowed students to pose the questions that they had prepared ahead of
time. Many of the questions were
insightful, and a surprising number of the questions dealt directly with what
it’s like to be a graduate student, and what it might be like to have a career
in the DNR, or with other agencies or private firms that may hire
limnologists. Students were especially
interested about cultural eutrophication, the degradation of water bodies due
to anthropogenic sources of nutrients.
Mr. Nikolai referenced several instances of algae blooms on Grand Lake,
a massive reservoir in eastern Oklahoma.
In preparation for the video-chat meeting, we had watched several news
report videos from You Tube that described the impact of the algae bloom on
recreation.
![]() |
| Water samples from Grand Lake |
Students were amazed to find out that some algae species
(cyanobacteria in fresh water) can produce neurotoxins which can cause
significant health problems in otherwise healthy people. The line of questioning stayed with these
neurotoxins for most of the time we had to talk to my friend, with one
exception.
Politics and science intersected during an algal bloom on
Grand Lake in Oklahoma, as a congressman took the unusual step of disagreeing
with state DNR and health officials, ignoring warnings to stay off the
lake. He later recanted, but the state
agencies were infuriated at the mixed messages that could compromise
lake visitor safety.
To summarize, almost all the students enjoyed the teleconference
are were eager to hear more about the water and nutrient cycles, due I imagine
in no small part to Mr. Nikolai’s presentation and discussion on limnology.
I will definitely try to continue these types of
interactions between students and professionals in science, in the future.

No comments:
Post a Comment